Jul 25, 2011

The Thing You Fear the Most is Now Among You

Because the producers think John Carpenter's cult classic “The Thing” was already perfect, so making a remake would be like "painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa", they convinced Universal Studios to allow them to create a prequel to that film which actually a remake of 1951’s film “The Thing from Another World”. Question is why they don’t think to make a sequel instead as the original film is let loose on nearby New Zealand? However, this prequel still gonna use the title of the original film since the prequel project team couldn't think of a subtitle (for example, "The Thing: Begins") that sounded good and felt reverential. Adapted from a 1938 science fiction novella by John W. Campbell, Jr. that was voted by the Science Fiction Writers of America as one of the finest science fiction novellas ever written, Carpenter's “The Thing” was a more faithful adaptation of the novella with strong cast of character actors and plenty of truly astounding but grotesque make-up effects from Rob Bottin. But opening two weeks after huge sci-fi flick "E.T. " that already won the hearts and wallets of audiences back in 1982, “The Thing” eventually met a really poor box office performance. But fortunately it has gone on to gain a cult following with the release on home video and was subsequently 'novelized' in 1982, also adapted into a Dark Horse’s comic book miniseries that followed by a video game sequel in 2002. The movie even now considered as one example of the rare instance where a remake is far superior to the original. So how about this 2011 prequel? Producers Marc Abraham and Eric Newman, who were behind the quite good remake of "Dawn of the Dead", said that it won’t just fill out the backstory of the original but allows some of the same elements to be seen from an entirely different point of view. The plan is also to go old school with the creature effects with most of the FXs are being done practically with the minimal CG provided by FX house Image Engine who did the aliens in "District 9". Set at the Norwegian base camp several days before the events at the American base camp in the Carpenter original, chronicles how the shape-shifting alien was first discovered, the movie director Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. and crew also researched the original film and novella thoroughly to recreate the Norwegian camp accurately down to the smallest detail. Various Norwegian actors even were cast to play the supporting roles, though the key roles will be American characters. The language barrier between them and the English speaking characters is exploited to add to the film's feeling of paranoia.“The Thing” Synopsis: Antarctica: an extraordinary continent of awesome beauty. It is also home to an isolated outpost where a discovery full of scientific possibility becomes a mission of survival when an alien is unearthed by a crew of international scientists. The shape-shifting creature, accidentally unleashed at this marooned colony, has the ability to turn itself into a perfect replica of any living being. It can look just like you or me, but inside, it remains inhuman. In the thriller The Thing, paranoia spreads like an epidemic among a group of researchers as they’re infected, one by one, by a mystery from another planet.
Paleontologist Kate Lloyd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) has traveled to the desolate region for the expedition of her lifetime. Joining a Norwegian scientific team that has stumbled across an extraterrestrial ship buried in the ice, she discovers an organism that seems to have died in the crash eons ago. But it is about to wake up. When a simple experiment frees the alien from its frozen prison, Kate must join the crew’s pilot, Carter (Joel Edgerton), to keep it from killing them off one at a time. And in this vast, intense land, a parasite that can mimic anything it touches will pit human against human as it tries to survive and flourish.In a Place Where There Is Nothing, They Found These Facts:

# Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. became involved in the project when his first planned feature film, a zombie movie taking place in Las Vegas written and produced by Zack Snyder called “Army of the Dead”, was cancelled by the studio three months before production began. Needing to start all over again, he asked his agent to see if there was a “The Thing” project in development, since “Alien” and “The Thing” are his favourite movies.

# Heijningen Jr. explained that he created the film not to simply be a horror movie, but to also focus largely on the human drama with the interaction between characters, as the first film had. The director felt that horror movies worked better when time was spent to explore the characters' emotional journeys, allowing the audience to care about them.

# The film will show the alien creature in its “pure form”, as it was discovered in its ship by the Norwegians; however, it is not revealed whether this is the creature's original form or the form of another creature it had assimilated.

# The filmmakers drew additional inspiration for the film from the original novel “Who Goes There?”, in making the characters in the film educated scientists as opposed to "blue collar" workers. However, the filmmakers drew no influence from the events of the The Thing video game. The director also drew additional inspiration from the film Alien in creating the film, particularly in regard to casting a female lead, and in the way the alien creatures are filmed by not showing too much of them.# On set, the director had a laptop computer which contained "a million" screen captures of the Carpenter film, which he used as a point of reference to keep the Norwegian camp visually consistent with the first film.

# In order to not try to compete with Kurt Russell's portrayal of the 1982 film's protagonist, MacReady, the character of Kate Lloyd (Winstead) was designed to have traits in common with the character Ellen Ripley from the Alien film series.

# Winstead insisted that the film would not feature any romantic or sexual elements with her character, as it would be inappropriate considering the tone of the film.

# Dennis Storhøi (The 13th Warrior) was cast as Sander but pulled out of production due to personal reasons. He was replaced by Ulrich Thomsen (In a Better World).

# CG elements in the film was confined to matte paintings and set extensions, along with a few instances of "digitally creating extensions on some of the practical animatronic effects". Like the xenomorph in the original "Alien", the creatures and mutation effects will be used sparingly and shot in ways that don't reveal too much.

# Universal delayed the release a full six months to allow some reshoots, the intention was to "enhance existing sequences or to make crystal clear a few story beats or to add punctuation marks to the films feeling of dread.” Lead actress Mary Elizabeth Winstead also was returned to shoot more scenes.

# John Carpenter wished to have a cameo appearance in the film, but scheduling conflicts prevented this.
Sources: Wikipedia, IMDB – Photos courtesy of Universal Pictures

26 Thoughts:

The Angry Lurker said...

Sounds like it should be worth a watch, thanks for the review.

magnums said...

completely exciting for this movie though the tittle feel like a remake not a prequel.They really did miss the oppurtunity to name this something great.

Anonymous said...

I wonder how they're going to pull this off. Apparently this is the
story of the original research team that is seen chasing the dog in the opening sequence of the original film. If so, obviously they fail to contain The Thing since they're chasing it at the start of the original. Not exactly a compelling end.

DEZMOND said...

as you know I do like this film, since I love movies set in a winter setting and in an isolated setting. Such films are always super scary :0

faster jj said...

I loved The Thing from the 80's! Can't wait to see this one! I wish Kurt Russell would come back though.

Fritz said...

original was 'masterpiece', one of best thriller movies ever! this one looks 90% copy and is a complete remake except the part they find 'the thing' under some ice....

Anonymous said...

I hope this prequel will work as John Carpenter's The Thing is my favourite horror movie ever and it is a legendary classic

Brclay said...

been following this movie for a while now and i have faith in based on what the director has said and the decisions he has made regarding plot and characters. great post!

Fred 10 said...

I have heard that this end with a direct tie in, that should make the 2 film splice into one. fingers crossed.

kevner5 said...

It could be good and I’ll watch anything that has Mary Elizabeth Winstead in it :D

VeV said...

the film is a prequel and they were too lazy to even slap a cheap subtitle on there. so, when you watch the two together, you get "The Thing" and its sequel..."The Thing"

Jay said...

i must admit the trailer hooked me, even if i'm not such an horror fan.

L0p3z said...

Exciting, but it has some major boots to fill as the 1982 version has not only stood up to the rigors of time but has become a legndary cinematic experience.

Anonymous said...

The poster is almost a rip off of the original’s poster and while it is effective, it’s not doing anything new. And as for the trailer, well it’s nothing special. The film is clearly trying to do something creepy but from what I can see, it really only cranks up the effects with more CGI and the level of noise.

msmariah said...

I think this film is masquerading as a prequel but is really a remake. John Carpenter's film was a masterpiece. I hope they don't mess it up. Ugh.

Funce said...

It would be cool if they could get Kurt Russell to do a cameo at the end when they're chasing the dog into his camp and end it there. Make us want to throw on the original to continue watching. As for the title, something like THE THING BEFORE wouldn't be bad.

Flavius said...

Glad it's a prequel but I still think this is a horrible idea. We'll see.

Anonymous said...

The movie looks good — a lot better than I expected, really — but there are so many shots that could be direct replicas of similar moments in John Carpenter’s film.

ixeman said...

Cool preview! Haven't seen the original but I'll see this and probably gonna enjoy it.

caseymoviemania said...

Well, I was pretty skeptical about this remake of THE THING. I mean, John Carpenter's version was a true horror classic. Till now, the makeup effects, the chilling atmosphere and those unforgettable cast lead by Kurt Russell still send me shivers when I watched the movie.

Hopefully this remake does justice with the John Carpenter's version.

Melissa Bradley said...

I loved The Thing and it is one of my all time ultimate favorite films. I own it, but watch it every single time it airs on television, too. I think I can quote it verbatim. LOL

I was initially not excited about this, but it sounds very cool from your preview. Great article!

Kingmush said...

Pretty excited about this one actually.

Matthew Vanacore said...

This has got LACKLUSTER written all over it. Gotta love capitalism, right!?

WaqasColt said...

Thanks FOr Sharing!!!

Anais said...

Nice blog, I've apprecied all content at movie-cafe blog. Good job and well done.
I was young when I saw 'the thing', and for this old age movie, the special effects aren't so bad, I'll say pretty good... to scare a young lady...
duuuh!

Dan Stephens said...

The original film is one of my favourite horror films of all time. That immediately puts the remake at a disadvantage. But I do love the story and think it will be hard to go wrong in terms of making a film that has the right amount of scares. I hope the special-effects don't detract though. I'll be checking this one out.

Post a Comment

 

Back to TOP